I walked off the stage at ASSP Safety '26 with about 15 minutes to spare. What I didn't expect was that half the room would stay for questions and four attendees would still be standing there long after everyone else had cleared out. That told me something. LINKEDIN POST I walked off the stage at ASSP Safety '26 last week with 15 minutes to spare. Half the room stayed for Q&A. Four people were still standing there long after everyone else had cleared out. That told me somet

I open my session at ASSP Safety '26 with one question on the screen and no answer. What does a positive marijuana drug test actually prove in 2026? Most safety managers think they know. The answer is more complicated than they expect, and the complication matters enormously for how they do their jobs.

I have spent weeks writing about why safety managers freeze when the moment arrives. About the panic, the wrong call, the gap between knowing and doing. On June 17th in Anaheim I am going to do something about it. Here is exactly what I intend to give the room before they walk out the door. LINKEDIN POST I have spent the past several weeks writing about why safety managers freeze when a tip comes in. About the panic. About reaching for the wrong tool. About knowing the sign

Getting a tip about an employee and sending them for a random test feels like action. But the moment you target a specific person, you've left random territory — and entered territory that can seriously expose your organization. Here's what the right process actually looks like.

I've spent more than 20 years in the background screening and drug testing industry. The conversation that makes safety managers most uncomfortable isn't about injury rates or OSHA audits — it's what to do when they think an employee came in impaired. Here's what reasonable suspicion really means, and what's at stake when the process breaks down.